3.5 Bowls of Popcorn (eaten, of course, in a library)
I had a professor that put a profound exclaimation point on the concept of symbols. It was my first day of my freshman year of college and I was sitting in an Introduction to Communication class. The professor walked in late (intentionally), stood at the lecturn without saying a word for 30 solid seconds, then proceeded to flip off the class of impressionalble freshmen. Why? Partly because he wanted to shock us, but mostly because he wanted to start the conversation about symbols. Why do they matter? What gives them power?
It’s simple: They matter because we make them matter. They have power because we give them power. The problem with this oh-so-simple plan is that symbols are then left open to interpretation.
This is the entire premise of The DaVinci Code.
I give this movie 3.5 bowls of popcorn. As much as I love Tom Hanks, I stand by my 3.5. Why such an average score? Because the book only deserves 3.5 bookmarks.
Yes, Dan Brown writes a thrilling tale, but it’s all so convenient. AND all his books are the same (therefore all the movies are the same). I do enjoy watching the movies (and reading the books), but after I watch a Dan Brown movie (or read a Dan Brown book), I always feel a little let down. It all fits together so nicely. Langdon always knows exactly the right symbol. Yes, yes, I know, he’s the hero and that’s how it is supposed to be, but it does get a little cliche after awhile.
What does fascinate me about The DaVinci Code, however, is this: Dan Brown’s book may not be full of true theology, but he does speak the occasional line of complete truth.
“As long as there has be one true God there has been killing in His name.”
…. Ouch.
So if I cringe at this movie and don’t like how “easy” it is, why do I own it? Because symbols are awesome (see first paragraph). To think that a fork-shaped object symbolizes Satan’s pitchfork to some and Posiden’s trident and power to others is, well, it’s just dang cool! It underlines the power of interpretation and meaning. Symbols have power because they evoke emotion (whether we want them to or not). But it is the interpretation of those symbols that sets us apart by time and space and worldview. Simply put, if I had been born in France in 1700, a fork-shaped object would mean something completely different to me than it does in the United States in 2015. We assume symbols are unchanging things, but that is far from the truth. Need a modern example? What did the rainbow flag or the Union Jack mean a century ago?
Side note: What bank has a safe passage clause? Dude. I want enough money to have an account in a bank that has a safe passage clause!